Glitter AI vs Lettria

Glitter AI turns screen recordings, videos, and live walkthroughs into polished step-by-step guides and SOPs. Record a process with the desktop app or browser extension, narrate as you go, and the platform captures screenshots, transcribes your speech, and writes the documentation for you.

You can also upload existing videos, including Zoom recordings, mobile screen captures, or footage of physical tasks, and Glitter converts them into editable guides. The guide editor lets you polish steps, screenshots, and copy before sharing via link, PDF, HTML, Markdown, or embed.

It supports 99 languages for recording and one-click translation. Teams at companies like Google, Walmart, and Salesforce use it for employee onboarding, IT runbooks, customer help articles, and compliance SOPs. The platform is SOC 2 Type II certified.

Lettria builds a graph context layer that turns enterprise documents and databases into ontology-backed knowledge graphs for automation teams. Its Knowledge Studio GraphRAG product parses PDFs, tables, SAP exports, and scanned annexes, then answers multi-hop questions with source citations. Perseus is the developer platform for generating ontologies and graphs without hand-modeling every entity.

Vector RAG tools retrieve similar chunks; Lettria follows explicit relationships across structured and unstructured data. The company publishes benchmark comparisons showing graph agents at 81.7% overall accuracy versus 57.5% for vector agents, plus text-to-graph claims of 30% higher accuracy and up to 400x faster extraction than general LLMs. That trade-off favors regulated teams that need audit trails over quick semantic search.

Finance, healthcare, legal, and engineering groups use Lettria for ESG filings, biomedical literature, contract corpora, and technical manuals. Case studies cite Alfa Laval (+30% extraction accuracy), AP-HP (+60% faster research), and Wisecube processing 108 GB of biomedical text into 500+ monitored classes.