PostBoost vs Tweet Hunter

PostBoost is a social media assistant that gives marketers and developers one workspace for scheduling, approvals, and publishing. Teams connect accounts across 12 or more channels, draft in a shared calendar, queue posts, and ship on a schedule or immediately. The free plan already includes full REST API access and webhook endpoints, so you can start in the dashboard and wire automations later without upgrading for API rights.

Most schedulers treat the API as a premium add-on or charge per call. PostBoost puts the same REST surface, official SDKs, and webhook callbacks on every plan, including free, with flat monthly pricing. That makes it a better fit when your publishing flow starts in a CMS, queue worker, or AI agent and you still want a calendar non-technical teammates can use.

Agencies get isolated workspaces per client with role-based permissions. Indie developers can publish from Python, Node.js, PHP, or Go clients and plug into n8n, Zapier, or Make. Solo creators can stay in the visual queue and use AI caption credits without touching code.

Tweet Hunter is a social media assistant for X that combines tweet discovery, scheduling, auto-DMs, analytics, and an AI writer in one Webflow app. You can search a library of viral posts, draft threads, queue content weeks ahead, and send automated DMs when people engage. Plans scale from one X account on Discover to unlimited accounts on Enterprise.

Most schedulers stop at posting. Tweet Hunter adds a 12M+ tweet library, CRM-style account lists, evergreen reposts, and AI rewrites aimed at creators who want growth workflows in one tab. The trade-off is X-only focus: it will not manage LinkedIn or Instagram from the same dashboard.

Creators and personal brands use it to cut daily posting time and track what drives followers and sales. Pricing runs from $29 per month on Discover to $49 on Grow with AI writing, plus a $199 Enterprise tier with ghostwriting mode and 15,000 auto-DMs per month. Every plan includes a 7-day free trial.