Ivory Mind (formerly Coral AI) vs scite.ai

Ivory Mind, formerly known as Coral AI, is an AI document assistant for uploading PDFs, Word files, presentations, audio, and video, then asking questions and getting cited answers. Every response includes clickable page-number or timestamp references so you can verify the source.

You can chat with individual files or bulk-upload your library and search across 100+ documents in one conversation. The platform supports 20+ file types, OCR for scanned PDFs and handwriting, audio and video transcription, and content generation from your source materials.

Ivory Mind is trusted by over 500,000 researchers, academics, and professionals. The free plan includes 2 file uploads; the Executive plan at $12 per month (billed yearly) adds unlimited uploads, bulk chat, and 150 audio or video transcriptions per month.

Scite helps research teams ask literature questions and get answers tied to full-text papers, not abstract snippets alone. Its Assistant searches across 280M+ full-text scholarly articles, and Smart Citations show whether later work supported, contradicted, or mentioned a finding.

General research chatbots guess when paywalls block the PDF. Scite licenses content from Wiley, SAGE, and 40+ other publishers, so it reads inside the paper and links each claim to a specific sentence you can verify in one click. That evidence-first design targets literature reviews where you need to know if a result still holds, not just that it exists.

Grad students run disputed-or-affirmed checks before citing a paper. R&D teams trace grants, clinical trials, and patents in one search. Pro users get API access, 2,500 MCP credits per month, and collections up to 10,000 papers. Scite also plugs into Claude, ChatGPT, and Zotero so answers show up inside existing workflows.