Recap vs Typeset

Dive into the comparison of Recap vs Typeset and discover which AI Summarizer tool stands out. We examine alternatives, upvotes, features, reviews, pricing, and beyond.

When comparing Recap and Typeset, which one rises above the other?

When we compare Recap and Typeset, two exceptional summarizer tools powered by artificial intelligence, and place them side by side, several key similarities and differences come to light. The users have made their preference clear, Typeset leads in upvotes. Typeset has garnered 25 upvotes, and Recap has garnered 7 upvotes.

Feeling rebellious? Cast your vote and shake things up!

Recap

Recap

What is Recap?

Enhance your web browsing with Recap, the open-source browser extension that empowers you to swiftly summarize any web content. Utilizing the intelligence of ChatGPT, Recap allows you to distill and understand vast information with the click of a button. Simply add Recap to Chrome and transform the way you interact with online text. Whether it's for research, study, or quick information gathering, Recap streamlines your online experience for free. With no need for a separate ChatGPT account, you can start summarizing efficiently, as seen on The Rundown. For any inquiries or updates, contact [email protected]. Recap is thoughtfully built by Yaozhi Wang, committed to enhancing your online productivity.

Typeset

Typeset

What is Typeset?

Your platform to explore and explain papers. Search for 270M+ papers, understand them in simple language, and find connected papers, authors, topics.

Recap Upvotes

7

Typeset Upvotes

25🏆

Recap Top Features

  • Summarization: Easily summarize any web content with ChatGPT integration.

  • Accessibility: Add Recap directly to Chrome for quick utilization.

  • User-Friendly: No ChatGPT account required to start summarizing.

  • Cost-Efficient: Recap is free to use making it accessible to everyone.

  • Support: Direct contact for users through [email protected] and regularly updated change log.

Typeset Top Features

No top features listed

Recap Category

    Summarizer

Typeset Category

    Summarizer

Recap Pricing Type

    Free

Typeset Pricing Type

    Free

Recap Tags

ChatGPT
Recap
Summarization Tool
Chrome Extension
Web Page Summarizer

Typeset Tags

Content Summary
AI Whitepapers
AI Emails

Recap Average Rating

No rating available

Typeset Average Rating

4.00

Recap Reviews

No reviews available

Typeset Reviews

Sara Sara
The simulation model validated experimental J-V and external quantum efficiency (EQE) to demonstrate an improvement in perovskite (PSK) solar cell (PSC) efficiency. The effect of interface properties at the electron transport layer (ETL)/PSK and PSK/hole transport layer (HTL) was investigated using the Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator (SCAPS). The interfaces between ETL, PSK, and HTL were identified as critical factors in determining high open-circuit voltage (Voc) and FF. In this study, the impact of two types of interfaces, ETL/PSK and PSK/HTL, were investigated. Lowering the defect density at both interfaces to 102 cm−2 reduced interface recombination and increased Voc and FF.The absorber layer defect density and n/i interface of perovskite solar cells were investigated using the Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator-1D (SCAPS-1D) at various cell thicknesses. The planar p-i-n structure was defined as PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/CdS, and its performance was calculated. With a defect density of <1014 cm−3 and an absorber layer thickness of >400 nm, power conversion efficiency can exceed 25%. The study assumed a 0.6 eV Gaussian defect energy level beneath the perovskite's conduction band, which has a characteristic energy of 0.1 eV. These conditions produced the same result on the n/i interface. These findings place constraints on numerical simulations of the correlation between defect mechanism and performance
By Rishit