Stytch vs ChatCraft

Stytch gives developers one API for login, authorization, and fraud checks in B2B and consumer apps. You add passkeys, SSO, SCIM, MFA, and machine-to-machine tokens without stitching Auth0-style add-ons to a separate risk vendor.

Where many auth platforms gate enterprise features behind sales calls, Stytch includes SSO, RBAC, and multi-tenancy in its pay-as-you-go tier with 10,000 monthly active users included. It also ships an embeddable admin portal so customers configure SAML and SCIM themselves.

Backend engineers, platform teams, and AI product builders use Stytch after Twilio acquired it to cover human users and agent identities in the same stack.

ChatCraft is a browser-based developer chat client for talking through code with large language models. You paste an OpenAI or OpenRouter API key, pick a model, and iterate on prompts with GitHub-flavored Markdown, syntax highlighting, and per-message edit, retry, and delete controls.

General chat UIs optimize for prose. ChatCraft stores every conversation in local IndexedDB, gives each chat its own URL, and lets you retry any assistant reply with a different model mid-thread. That makes it practical to compare GPT-4 against cheaper models on the same coding question without starting over.

The project is open source on GitHub, runs entirely client-side with no server install, and supports Mermaid diagram rendering plus optional sign-in with GitHub or Google. You pay only what your chosen provider charges per token.