Cogram vs MagicForm

Cogram gives architects and engineers one workspace for project documentation, from meeting minutes and field reports to RFIs, submittals, and project email. The platform connects to Procore, Deltek, Unanet, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Autodesk, Zoom, and Google Meet, then outputs drafts in your firm's templates instead of generic summaries.

Generic meeting assistants capture call notes. Cogram is built around AEC workflows: RFIs and submittals sync with Procore, field reports come from voice and photos on site, and the project Agent answers questions against drawings and correspondence. Modular pricing lets firms buy only the modules they need, and external collaborator accounts are free.

Project managers, design leads, and construction administrators use Cogram to cut repetitive admin work the homepage estimates can save several hours per week. Individuals can start a 14-day trial; team pricing is quoted per seat after a demo.

MagicForm puts a trained chat agent on your site that qualifies visitors, answers product questions, and nudges them toward a booking or purchase. You scan your site or upload documents to build its knowledge base, then drop in a copy-paste widget that runs around the clock.

Most chat widgets either dump visitors into a generic FAQ or hand off to a human queue. MagicForm sits in the middle: it asks the questions you define, checks answers against a learned Q&A bank before responding, and can fire webhooks, Zapier automations, or email alerts when a lead is ready to talk.

Solopreneurs and small teams use it to replace live chat staffing, while agencies pick the Premium plan for white-label domains and unlimited agents. Starter caps you at 500 messages per month on one agent; Pro adds Zapier and three team seats.